Aktuelle Neuigkeiten
Interview mit dem Tagesspiegel: Beeinflusst das Wetter, wen wir wählen?
Wählen im Winter: Das Wetter beeinflusst, für wen wir stimmen
Im Februar 2025 wird es Neuwahlen geben, im Winter statt wie sonst im Spätsommer. Ob sich die Jahreszeit auf das Wahlverhalten der Bürger*innen auswirkt und welche anderen Faktoren eine Rolle spielen, darüber sprechen Prof. Florian Kaiser und andere Kollegen in einem aktuellen Artikel im Tagesspiegel.
Neue Publikation: The role of attitude toward nature in learning about environmental issues
Available free of charge at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1471026
Baierl, T.-M., Kaiser, F. G. & Bogner, F. X. (2024). The role of attitude toward nature in learning about environmental issues. Frontiers in Psychology: Environmental Psychology, 15, 1471026
Abstract:
Neue Publikation: Wealth as an obstacle and a support for environmental protection
Available free of charge at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102449
Kaiser, F. G. & Urban, J. (2024). Wealth as an obstacle and a support for environmental protection. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 100, 102449.
Abstract:
Highlights:
-Wealth effects are not perplexing when wealth's behavioral relevance is understood.
-When engaging in behavior, individuals typically have to incur costs.
-A population's behavior indicates how supportive the conditions are for action.
-For populations, a surplus in money helps furnish behavior-supportive conditions.
-Wealth helps populations protect the environment, but helps and hinders individuals.
Neue Publikation: Exploring intergenerational differences in consumer acceptance of insects-fed farmed fish
Available free of charge at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2024.105165
Trentinaglia, M. T., Adler, M., Peri, M., Panzone, L., & Baldi, L. (2024). Exploring intergenerational differences in consumer acceptance of insects-fed farmed fish. Food Quality and Preference, 117, 105165.
Abstract:
This study delves into the multi-faceted process of consumer acceptance of innovative food products, such as insect-fed farmed fish. This is a food product that introduces new, though potentially conflicting, intangible attributes aligning with circularity and sustainability but also evoking negative emotions, such as disgust or neophobia. Drawing from two distinct studies on young and older Italian consumers, we employ an intergenerational lens to explore individual psychometric characteristics, socio-demographic variables, and nudging effects in shaping the acceptance process. We apply the Campbell Paradigm, integrating three acceptance items into well-established scales measuring attitudes towards the environment and nature.
Our results reveal that environmental protection inclination, rather than a connectedness to nature, primarily drives acceptance. Notably, young consumers exhibit a more facile acceptance process, indicating lower behavioral costs at each stage. Sociodemographic variables, particularly gender, exert varied influences on acceptance stages, with older women displaying greater hesitancy in adopting new dietary practices. Additionally, exploring the impact of nudges, we find that information significantly influences acceptance, while visual priming does not. Interestingly, the effectiveness of information varies between generations, indicating different reactions and responses.
The findings propose strategies for policymakers and marketers to highlight the positive attributes of insects-fed farmed fish, emphasizing sustainability and addressing consumer disgust concerns. Introducing insects as feed in various farming practices may enhance familiarity with this alternative protein source, potentially reducing disgust and fostering widespread acceptance.
Highlights:
-Exploring Intergenerational Variances in Acceptance of Novel Foods.
-Socio-Demographic Nuances: Unpacking Influences on Insects-Fed Farmed Fish Acceptance.
-Psychological Drivers: A Rasch Model Analysis of Environmental Attitudes in Novel Food Adoption.
Interview mit tageschau 24: Gibt es eine „Eco Gender Gap“ wirklich?
Gibt es eine „Eco Gender Gap“ wirklich? Diese Frage wollte unsere Kollegin Juliane Bücker für die Klimazeit auf tagesschau24 beantworten.
In einer Reanalyse der von Bauske et al. (2022) aufbereiteten Daten der Umweltbewusstseinsstudie 2018 und verschiedener eigener Datensätze findet sich konsistent ein kleiner Effekt: Frauen haben eine signifikant höhere Umwelteinstellung als Männer.
Die Sendung zeigt viele spannende Perspektiven zu Gendergerechtigkeit und Umweltschutz auf ist noch bis zum 25.03.24 in der Mediathek.